A statute is ambiguous only where it is open to two or more constructions, or where it is of such obscure or doubtful meaning that reasonable minds might disagree or be uncertain as to its meaning.
Retrieved Garner, Bryan.
Files, title, hot, recent, browse » Upload File » Language: AllAfrikaansAlbanianAmerican Sign Language. .
Das alte Paar versucht auf seine Art mit der Situation fertig zu werden.More titles to consider, back to Fiction Literature, more By Martin Suter.If, for example, the statute says "motor vehicles then the court is most likely to construe that the legislation is referring to the broad range of motorised vehicles normally required to travel along roadways and not "aeroplanes" or "bicycles" even though aeroplanes are vehicles propelled.Statutes, however, although they make the law, may be open to interpretation and have ambiguities.Deference edit Deference canons instruct the court to defer to the interpretation of another institution, such as an administrative agency or Congress.Of course, the cardinal rule is to ascertain and effectuate legislative intent.United States, 22 or Coco v The Queen.If that individual argued to the court that a motorcycle is not a "motor vehicle then the court would have to interpret the statute to determine what the legislature meant by "motor vehicle" and whether or not the motorcycle fell within that definition and was.5 It is presumed that a statute will be interpreted eiusdem generis, so that words are to be construed in sympathy with their immediate context."In interpreting a statute a court should always turn to one cardinal canon before all others.Courts must presume that a legislature says in a statute what it means and means in a statute what it says there." Connecticut Nat'l Bank.346, 353, 871.2d 1352, 1359 (1994).Retrieved 9 November 2015.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.) "peculiar".Der Teufel von Mailand, tipico casino chips übertragen martin Suter 10,99, allmen und die Libellen, martin Suter 8,99.
Here the statute may even be interpreted contra legem in exceptional cases, if otherwise a patently unreasonable result would follow.